- Background Screening
- Industry Solutions
- Why Data Facts
- Client Support
- Client Login
- Applicant Support
February 20, 2020
Illinois Enacts Workplace Transparency Act, Effective January 1, 2020
Share this post
Illinois created a bill last year that addressed discrimination and harassment in the workplace. SB-75, or the "Workplace Transparency Act" passed during the General Assembly on June 2, 2019.
The bill, which passed with support from both parties, implemented new laws and addressed current ones on the books that relate to sexual harassment and discrimination.
- The Act applies to contracts entered into with employees and non-employees (defined to include individuals who are directly performing services for the employer pursuant to a contract, including contractors and consultants).
Employers may no longer unilaterally require arbitration of any claim arising under any law enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) or the Illinois Department of Human Rights (“IDHR”). This includes claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, the Equal Pay Act and the Illinois Human Rights Act (collectively, “EEO Laws”). Any unilaterally required arbitration clause pertaining to EEO laws will be deemed void to the extent it denies substantive or procedural rights or remedies. (Although this provision potentially conflicts with and thus may be preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, no so such challenge has yet to be raised to the courts.)
Employers cannot unilaterally condition employment or continued employment on an agreement that has the purpose or effect of preventing individuals from making truthful statements or disclosures about violations of EEO laws (e.g., a confidentiality clause that prohibits reporting of EEO violations).
However, agreements that reflect mutual conditions of employment (e., that are negotiated between an employer and employee in good faith for consideration in order to obtain or retain employment) are permissible, but only where they are: (A) in writing; (B) demonstrate actual, knowing, and bargained-for consideration from both parties; and (C) expressly acknowledge the right of the employee or prospective employee to (i) report good-faith allegations of violations of EEO laws; (ii) report good-faith allegations of criminal conduct; (iii) participate in proceedings before EEOC and/or state or federal agency enforcing EEO laws; and (iv) make truthful statements required by law.
Confidentiality is the preference of the employee and is mutually beneficial to both parties;
The employer notifies the employee in writing of his or her right to attorney review of the agreement before its execution;
There is valid and bargained-for consideration for the exchange of confidentiality;
The agreement does not waive claims of EEO violations that accrue after the date the agreement is executed;
The employee has 21 days to consider the agreement before execution; and
Unless knowingly and voluntarily waived by the employee, the employee has 7 calendar days following the execution of the agreement to revoke it.
Employee termination and/or separation agreements that include confidentiality covenants relating to EEO violations are permissible only where:'
Employers doing business in Illinois should review these new regulations and put them into play in their current and future employee agreements.
*Portions of the blog were originally posted at The National Law Review.
Susan McCullah is the Marketing Project Manager for Data Facts Background Screening Division.
Other posts you might be interested inView All Posts
EEOC Guidance Criticized During House Panel MeetingRead More
Alternate Screening Solutions Employers Should Probably be UsingRead More
Employment screening policy